![]() ![]() Wikipedia’s assertion that “most female serial killers murder for money or other such material gain” is not a very useful generalization. A more ambitious research effort should be expected to increase the number substantially above the current count of more than 1,000. A study by the editor of The Unknown History of MISANDRY, using only fragmentary English-language newspapers and google as sources, has turned up hundreds of cases beyond the 140 collected in the longest published list of female serial killer cases, that in Peter Vronsky’s 2007 book. 2) Very little historical research has been done on female serial killers. In contradiction to this claim two points should be noted: 1) the vast majority of female serial killers (of victims other than babies, whose corpses were often secretly discarded or destroyed) leave corpses which are believed by others to be the result of non-homicidal causes, thus making serial-killer victims and perpetrators much more difficult to estimate than in cases of male serial killers, where victims are usually easily identified as murder victims. 2011) asserts that “Female serial killers are rare.” “Rare” is a vague term and its use here is not explained. The FBI still thinks of women who kill as reluctant sidekicks.” “It is only recently that we have acknowledged that female serial killers, for example, exist. ” – Martina Cole, Britain’s most popular crime writer, presenter of BBC series on female serial killers in 2008. I think women have got away with it for a lot longer. “I don't think there’s much different between male and female serial killers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |